A friend writes that in her deep-red part of the country yet another conspiracy theory is taking root: The Biden-as-Trojan-horse gambit, the Far Left’s way of sneaking Kamala Harris into the Oval Office. In this fervid fever fantasy, a frail Biden will not fill out much of his term and Harris is a progressive darling who will enact Medicare for All, raise the minimum wage, and destroy the American Way Of Life by implementing the Green New Deal.
Hearing these fears I was at first dismissive: Harris is neither Bernie Sanders nor Elizabeth Warren, nor is she Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, Ayanna Pressley, or Ilhan Omar. And while I personally favor a more progressive agenda, I also recognize that politics is the art of the possible (see here and here): it does no good, and in the end considerable harm (in lost time, lost energy, and lost opportunity for compromise), to advocate — for example — universal government health insurance if the proposal will be met by unreasoned and unrestrained emotional resistance. “Medicare for all” isn’t socialism any more than automobile insurance or monthly condominium maintenance fees. It isn’t a terrible prospect and would likely save considerable lives and dollars. Opponents have been unable to articulate any real and substantive objection, ranting instead about keeping Government away from the doctor-patient relationship. (They seem to have no problem with insurance companies coming between you and your doctor, but that’s a discussion for another day.)
None of this analysis will help my friend convince her friends and neighbors that their fears are irrational and overwrought. Paraphrasing Jonathan Swift, you can’t reason a man out of a position he didn’t reason himself into. Or, as the Federalist congressman Fisher Ames, of Massachusetts, characterized such strongly held opinions:
They will not yield to argument; for, as they were not reasoned up, they cannot be reasoned down. They are higher than a Chinese wall in truth’s way, and built of materials that are indestructible.
With all Trump’s palaver and frothing at the mouth about impenetrable walls, Fisher’s turn of phrase seems particularly apt today. Since 1980 the GOP has excelled at convincing people to vote against their own self-interest, often by screaming, “Socialism!” Democrats would do well to better understand the emotional buttons the GOP has mastered.
And Republicans: If your best path to electoral victory is through voter suppression, what does that say about your policies? This segment from NPR’s On the Media is as chilling as it is eye opening. Of course every “legal” ballot should be counted. We should all — all — be worried about a political party that defines “legal” as “for us” and “illegal” as “for them.” If you doubt that characterization — which I admit sounds outlandish — take a look at the situation in Georgia, whose two sitting United States senators are calling for the resignation of the Secretary of State (whose job includes election oversight). Why? Because this fellow Republican didn’t deliver the election to them. Instead, he did his job and counted the votes.
2 thoughts on “Hysteria”
Dead on. Excellent argument.
Increasingly, I have come to believe that, at least for Democrats, who seem to understand “the art of the possible” with respect to the processes of governing and legislating as talking about and doing only what can be achieved given the specific and immediate composition of the various branches of government, is a demonstrably failed strategy. I wish more politicians would campaign on stretch goals, issues that would benefit the people, even if they can’t be achieved in the near term. Approaching politics and governance this way would:
(1) Educate the public on the issue (Universal healthcare once clearly and properly understood is probably something a majority of Americans want. Remember the differences in polling between “Obamacare” and “Affordable Health Care”?);
(2) Plant the seed for the issue (the reality is that it takes a long time for the public to get comfortable with anything new, the newer the idea or concept, the longer it will take. If our politicians and government leaders continually settle for whatever the public can swallow in the moment, we’ll never get anywhere. The Founding Fathers had to both educate and campaign for the Colonies to accept the new form of government; see the Federalist Papers; and
(3) By shooting down range (switching to a military metaphor) there’s more of what’s “possible” ground right in front that can be captured.